it’s sort of ironic to post this right after skipping my first workout in four weeks. yesterday i had a threshold run and a moderate bike ride, and i was so...
it’s sort of ironic to post this right after skipping my first workout in four weeks. yesterday i had a threshold run and a moderate bike ride, and i was so whipped after the run that i couldn’t bring myself to face the bike workout. so i skipped it. i skipped a bike workout four weeks ago, too, so i feel real guilty about that.
one in the early spring of my senior year of college, i was recovering from the flu, and talking with track coach Pete Farwell about what workout i ought to do that day. he said there would be two groups: one of middle-distance guys doing something like 3 times 2 minutes fast – 1 minute easy – 1 minute fast, and one of longer distance guys doing something like 3 times 10 minutes hard with 4 minutes rest. he said i should go with the longer distance guys.
i asked him, “oh, is that better because i’ll get to run a little slower, so there will be less injury risk?”
and he said, “no, will, it’s better because it’s more.”
that stuck with me. in the quest for faster race times, so often we’re concerned about “overtraining” or “overreaching” or somehow hurting performance by working too hard. ninety-nine percent of the time, though, the thing to do isn’t to rest more, its to train more. it’s not going to be easy, and it’s not going to feel great, and it probably won’t make you feel self-actualized. it is going to make you fitter, and it is going to make you faster, and that was the whole point in the first place.